Blog Post 2:
Women Strike for Peace
The women of WSP we’re able to mobilize a movement and gain
such a great momentum that they were able to go before the HUAC, a name that
was feared by many Americans in the 1950’s and 60’s. The WSP set out with a message
of disarmament as well as transparency and inclusiveness from the US
government. On Page 127 of the book, it
states that “in 1964 WSP focused its protest –lobbying, demonstrating, and
letter writing –on a fallout shelter bill the Kennedy administration was
pushing and later deferred.” However, as the political climate began to change
in the states the concerns of the women changed. One of the most interesting
things that I found in chapter 6 was how the women in WSP perceived the threat
of Vietnam and how the threat of war changed the course of their movement.
In regard to the possibility of war, most of the women did not know and felt that there were
not capable of understanding what was going on in Vietnam. This type of
attitude would have been destructive for the movement because of all the lobbying and
protesting they had done previously.It seemed to be a setback to think that
these activities in Vietnam where out of their reach. But, yet again, the WSP
connected with the cause by thinking about motherhood internationally and
realizing that the safety of women and children around the world was just as
important as that in America. As we know now, a nuclear war has lasting affects
which women like Swerdlow and Herz could not foresee but they put themselves on
the line to protect a future they didn’t know. Soon, the women began educating
themselves on “the history of the political regimes in the North and South, the
French role in Vietnam, and the Geneva Accords of 1954.” The WSP new that in
order for the men to listen to them, they would have to know there stuff.
With the war still waging on, several branch groups started
out from WSP such as the JRB (Jeanette Rankin Brigade). Still, women of the WSP
and Vivian Hallinan wanted to focus more on attaining the attention of the
government and enacting law changes. The WSP got some of the attention they
needed by writing letters to President Nixon. Each letter had a basic template
of addressing the President and asking that their voices be heard and their
sons be spared, including a picture of the men in their lives that they were
trying to save. What also struck me during my readings was how the WSP became a
household name and how they were even feared by political figures who had come
to realize the strength of mothers in numbers. Using their “natural duty as
women” they were able to have a mass influence over the government and war
policies. While some modern feminist might argue that coming from the issue of war from such a narrowed stand point is detrimental to the fight for equality, it was the only means by which these women could be effective. They may not have been educated in Political Science or theory but they knew very well the detriment of war. Instead of fighting from a place that they didn't fully know, the WSP armed itself with educated and spirited mothers, wives, and daughters who could speak intimately from their positions as women and then work on the bigger details later.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou have a valid point that the Vietnam War created a lot of controversy and political debate. But why? With all the propaganda towards Vietnam and our semi-comfortable living, what drove us to actually care about the so-called enemy we were fighting? Is it because we realized we are all human beings? Or is it because of the idea that peace cannot be attained unless it is on a global scale?
ReplyDeletePeace has been a nigh-unreachable ideal in past civilizations, so what makes us believe that it's possible in current society? Are we too naive to think otherwise? Or are we learning from past generation's failures and attempting to achieve where they once failed? These are things we must ponder, since we must learn from our history, otherwise we are doomed to repeat it
What I found interesting about the shift in focus to the Vietnam war was the shift to international tactics that came along with it. The women of WSP were able to keep their motherhood identity while traveling to international meetings and protesting with women from around the world. When I think of the stereotypical mother that plays into gender roles like these women claimed to, I don't think about internationally traveling women. By putting the safety of every husband and of every son as their top priority these women were able to make connections with Vietnamese women and talk of peace long before the end of the war. I wonder if the women of the WSP had not had the means to travel, would they have found successful ways to convene their international message of peace?
ReplyDelete